FitNesse.
IsLoginNecessary
We don't know if login is necessary. At the moment we haven't had any security issues. Does anybody else think that we should implement login security?

If you are thinking of running a FitNesse server at your own site, and you are concerned about security, It seems to me that you could:


If enough people want login security, we'll certainly implement it.


This is a great tool. However, in our environment (big company) we need to control logging + adding a footer indicating who is editing the pages. (MadDog).




I agreed with MadDog. Sercurity is very important is a business envirnment, even in the reqirement gathering and acceptance test writing phrase. (TM)




I'm a TWiki addict (perl implementation)! TWiki's philosophy is to handle this outside wiki with SSL. I don't know the implications for the FitNesse web server. TWiki, anon by default, also supports LoginForIdentification meaning you are TWikiGuest while browsing, but are prompted for a registered username when you change a page. This 2nd version is to get a name into version control (yeah, TWiki sits on top of RCS).

OMG there are major differences between WikiInstructions and TWikiTextFormattingRules... I don't care, I love them both!

-- Dhominator






[ User Guide] [.FrontPage] [.RecentChanges]